Consumer centricity: Why are we still getting it wrong?
It’s like trying to find hay in a haystack.
To find a CEO or a Marketing Director enthusing about a consumer-centric strategy here, an empathy directive there, a desire to put the consumer at the heart of everything, everywhere.
“A strategic priority for management is consumer-centric growth”
Dirk Van de Put. CEO, Mondelez
So common are these utterings, that you’d think that this was a problem solved.
“It’s about having the spirit of a small company −
the consumer-centricity and empathy…”
Peter Erickson, General Mills
You’d be easily forgiven for thinking we’re riding high on a gleeful wave of consumer centricity.
That the consumer is in for a lovely time. Brands understanding everything they do. Able to produce products, communications and adverts that speak to them. Fully cognisant on how and why they, the consumer, behave the way they do.
“We are continuing on our mission to connect to the soul of consumers”
Shalabh Atray. CMO, Kraft Heinz
But that’s clearly not the case.
In fact, it seems like our collective knowledge of consumers (people) is getting worse?
That the empathy gap is growing, not shrinking.
Is it possible we’re reaching the end of empathy at a wider societal level?
“What remains the same is our focus on deeply understanding how consumers live, work and play so we know precisely what they want”
Kathy Fish. Chief R&D and Innovation, P&G
Certainly, if the modern world is anything to go by (the shock of Trump, the surprise of Brexit; both appealing to the unheard masses) the empathy gap is an illustration of how badly we can get it wrong, and as such companies are just reflecting what is true in wider society.
Yet with all this big data, surely this shouldn’t happen?
Could big data actually be to blame?
Does anyone actually care anymore?
What does the consumer know anyway?
“Get closer than ever to your customers. So close that you tell them what they need well before they realise it themselves”
I think the reason for the empathy gap lies in one of 3 things:
1. We don’t need to do it
Ever been on Amazon? On Spotify? On Netflix?
People that bought this also bought this?
You might like this because you watched/listened to this?
Those algorithms are working hard, but by their very existence are they removing your ability to think wider?
Finding that new band, reading a different book, watching a more obscure programme.
With everyone being told what they like, our outlook is becoming narrower, not wider.
Are you on Twitter? How many people do you follow who you despise, whose opinions you actively disagree with? I would wager that in most cases it’s a low number. You follow people you agree with, you block those you don’t. Narrowing your outlook even further.
Read the same papers you’ve always read? Get the news from the same outlet? All narrowing.
All these factors make you less likely to understand people, and more likely to believe that what you hear, listen to, read, watch, is the same as everyone else.
You don’t know the consumer, you know you.
2. Say it, but don’t do it
People are definitely saying it. No question. Look at all the quotes in this article that I found with just 10 minutes of searching the web.
But simply writing it in an annual statement, or telling it to the umpteenth journalist, doesn’t make it happen.
That’s why you see those spectacular #fails that often make the headlines – adverts, product launches, comms pieces.
It is companies saying they’re consumer-centric, over and over, brainwashing themselves into such a belief while never actually carrying it out
What’s said vs what’s done.
Now, where have I read about that before? 😉
3. We’re doing it, aren’t we?
Best as I can find, consumer centricity is defined as:
“an approach to doing business that focuses on providing a positive customer experience”
Which gives zero clues as to how to actually do it.
For some companies just harvesting data and ensuring that they know what the consumer does, is consumer-centric.
For others, they may be asking questions that the consumer does not know the answer to.
The consumer doesn’t know what they want. But that doesn’t mean research can’t identify the need.
If you do bad research or the wrong type of research, then you won’t get the answers that matter. Instead, look at the problem and identify what you need to know.
“The company is taking an entrepreneurial, “test-and-learn” approach to growing and scaling a consumer-centric beverage portfolio”
James Quincey. CEO, Coca-Cola
A good example of bad research: the BBC has a programme called The Customer is Always Right. Entrepreneurs get to see what people think of their products… on national TV. These are people who know they’re going to be on telly. Who’ll tell their friends. Who will be forced to give an opinion. Who will over-do their response.
It’s not authentic and it’s broadly useless.
Sure, get them to test and use your product – but in context, not out of context.
“We talk about big data and the complexity of our systems
and the one fundamental that we have to embrace
will come to a head is keeping the consumer in the centre”
Pete Blackshaw, Nestle
Big data has given us access to more information on what the consumer is doing than ever before, however it is not solving the consumer-centric conundrum.
For that, we need to think about observing actual consumer behaviour as well as, not instead of, big data.
“I’m looking forward to helping shape our global customer agenda for the future as we look to bring the voice of our customers into everything we do”
Emma Evison, Global Customer Strategy, Mars Petcare
The right combination of data and thick data is the one that needs to be explored.
The results of which would not only be improved commercial growth, but also a more empathetic, more understanding, and, dare I say, better society.
Not a bad side effect all things considered.
“We have a new vector around empathy and how we think about communities in the digital age. Empathy allows us to ignite a social movement for good”
Alison Lewis, CMO, J&J